multi-agent-governance

Multi-Agent Governance Framework

NIST AI RMF License: MIT Discussions

A governance framework for multi-agent AI systems — covering oversight, accountability, inter-agent trust, and risk management for systems where multiple AI agents collaborate or compete to complete tasks.


Why Multi-Agent Systems Need Dedicated Governance

Single-agent AI systems are complex. Multi-agent systems compound that complexity:


Framework Components

1. Agent Classification

Before deploying a multi-agent system, classify each agent:

Dimension Categories
Role Orchestrator / Executor / Validator / Monitor
Trust Level Trusted / Semi-trusted / Untrusted (for external agents)
Autonomy Level Supervised / Semi-autonomous / Fully autonomous
Risk Class High / Medium / Low (based on possible impact of failure)
Data Access Read-only / Read-write / No access

2. Inter-Agent Trust Model

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    ORCHESTRATOR                          │
│              (high trust, human-supervised)              │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
                       │ delegates tasks + validates outputs
           ┌───────────┼───────────┐
           ▼           ▼           ▼
    ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
    │ AGENT A  │ │ AGENT B  │ │ AGENT C  │
    │(executor)│ │(executor)│ │(validator│
    │semi-trust│ │semi-trust│ │high-trust│
    └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
           │                       │
           ▼                       ▼
    ┌──────────┐             ┌──────────┐
    │EXTERNAL  │             │ HUMAN    │
    │  TOOL    │             │ REVIEW   │
    │(untrusted│             │(required │
    │ sandbox) │             │for high  │
    └──────────┘             │  risk)   │
                             └──────────┘

3. Governance Gates for Multi-Agent Systems

Gate Timing Requirements
System Design Review Before development Agent roles, trust model, and failure modes documented
Individual Agent Validation Before integration Each agent validated independently
Integration Testing Before staging End-to-end scenarios including failure injection
Red Team Before production Adversarial scenarios: prompt injection, agent hijacking, goal manipulation
Human Oversight Check Before production Human review points defined for all high-risk decision paths
Monitoring Activation At deployment Per-agent and system-level monitoring configured

4. Accountability Framework

For every multi-agent system, document:

5. Monitoring Requirements

Metric Frequency Alerting Threshold
Task completion rate Real-time Drop > 10% from baseline
Inter-agent latency Real-time P99 > configured SLA
Agent error rate Real-time Error rate > 1%
Goal drift (planned vs. actual) Per task Configurable by use case
Token usage / cost Hourly > 150% of daily budget
Human escalation rate Daily > 20% increase week-over-week

NIST AI RMF Alignment

Full mapping: docs/nist-rmf-mapping.md

Key NIST AI RMF categories addressed:


Ecosystem

Repository Purpose
agent-system-simulator Simulate and evaluate multi-agent system behavior
multi-agent-orchestration-patterns Orchestration design patterns for multi-agent pipelines
ai-agent-evaluation-framework Evaluation metrics and benchmarks for AI agents
enterprise-ai-governance-playbook Organizational governance playbook
nist-ai-rmf-implementation-guide NIST AI RMF practitioner guide

Maintained by Sima Bagheri · Connect on LinkedIn